Carbon Capture and Storage
Earth Journalism Network, Global
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a proposal for mitigating climate change.
The idea is to capture carbon dioxide from major sources such as coal-fired power stations and industry and then store it underground or beneath the sea-floor so it cannot reach the atmosphere.
Large spaces would be needed to store enough carbon dioxide for CCS to have real benefits but there are large enough geological formations and old oil and gas fields that could be used.
According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), A power plant with CCS requires the power plant to expend more energy, between 35-85 percent. However, from that increase in energy, there is an around 90 percent reduction in emissions.
The IPCC says that by 2050 the amount of carbon dioxide captured could represent 21-45 percent of all carbon dioxide emissions from human activities. So far, however, the technology has not been scaled up beyond pilot projects and most of these are in just a few countries.
CCS involves first separating the carbon dioxide from other gases and then purifying and compressing it for transport and storage. Carbon dioxide can be transported through pipelines or in liquid form in ships.
The costs of CCS will depend on which technological approach it used, where the carbon dioxide is stored and how far it must be transported. Additionally, CCS would only be cost-effective when used at a massive scale, such as a large coal-fired plant.
The term CCS can also be used to describe biological processes, such as those that capture carbon dioxide and use it to grow algae that can be used to make animal feed or other products. This can be termed ‘Bio CCS’. Biochar is also sometimes considered to be a form of CCS.
Specific concerns that NGOs, researchers and some governments have raised about CCS focus on its feasibility, cost and safety. There are concerns, for instance, that carbon dioxide could leak from where it is stored and get into the atmosphere.
Fears that carbon dioxide injected into the deep ocean could cause environmental harm mean that this form of storage is no longer considered a viable option.
Other critics of CCS — such as the environmental organization Greenpeace — say that the coal industry is promoting it out of economic self-interest to justify building new new coal-fired power plants.
Greenpeace adds that CCS would not be ready in time to prevent dangerous climate change, and that there is no guarantee that the technology could be retro-fitted to existing power stations.
The IPCC considers CCS as an option for mitigation measures but acknowledges that cost is the most hindering aspect of the process.
One storyline that is set to develop is whether or not CCS will be included formally in a global deal to tackle climate change under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol.
Several countries oppose the inclusion of CCS in the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism as it is costly and has many technical challenges while others — such as Norway, Australia — have supported it.
IISD’s Earth Negotiations Bulletin will publish daily updates during meetings where these negotiations take place, and the Climate Change Media Partnership’s roster of experts includes CCS specialists who are willing to talk to journalists.
The Guardian newspaper’s website has a good collection of news articles, background information and other resources on CCS that provide a rich source of story ideas.
False Hope, a Greenpeace International report on CCS (PDF)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change special report on CCS – Summary for Policymakers – Full report(PDF)
Interactive map of major CCS sites (planned or operational) worldwide
Adapting to climate change will cost a lot more than thought
24 May 2016