Reporting on REDD+

Reporting on REDD+
Reporting on REDD+

Reducing emissions from deforestation, forest degradation, and enhancing forest carbon stocks in developing countries (REDD+) seems like an obvious way to tackle climate change. But REDD+ is controversial and fraught with technical challenges. Journalists who cover REDD+ need to understand these sides of the story, as well as the latest on what parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change have agreed about how REDD+ should work.

Questions to ask
• How reliable are the statistics on forest cover, deforestation rate, etc.? 

• What is in the text of the REDD+ project contracts? 

• How will the REDD+ project be funded, and for how long? 

• How will it be monitored, reported and verified? 

• What do local communities know and think about the project?

• How much carbon does the project prevent from entering the atmosphere? What does this equate to in terms normal people understand?

• Who manages the money? Who gets the money? Will it reach local forest dependent communities? Or will it go to logging companies?

• Who owns the forest? Is it the state or do local people have ownership or customary rights to use the forest?

• What safeguards are in place to ensure that a REDD+ project in one place won’t lead to more deforestation elsewhere?

• What has your country done to prepare for future REDD+ projects (known as REDD Readiness)? Does it have a REDD+ plan?

• Who are the stakeholders? Are you familiar with all of the competing viewpoints of REDD+ (government, NGO, community, private sector, etc.)? Does your reporting reflect majority views or the views of the powerful?

• Which stakeholders get to decide how REDD+ is implemented?

Sources of information

UN-REDD is the United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries.

The REDD Desk ( is an online collaborative platform for sharing information about all aspects of REDD. It has a country database with information about several African countries (http://www.theredddesk. org/countries).

REDD Monitor takes a critical view of REDD and its potential problems. It is a good source of news and story ideas (

The Global Canopy Programme ( is an international NGO that works largely on REDD+. Its Little REDD+ Book summarizes more than 30 proposals that have been made by different countries, nongovernmental groups and others (

UN Framework Convention on Climate Change: This site gathers information about the status of REDD+ in the UN climate change negotiations, and what individual countries have proposed ( items/7377.php).

The International Center for Forestry Research (CIFOR) is a leading source of research on REDD+. It has produced a global map of REDD+ projects (

The Ecosystems Climate Alliance ( is a network on nongovernmental organisations that campaign for stronger environmental and social safeguards in REDD+ design and implementation.

Reporting REDD: A guide for journalists produced by the Climate Change Media Partnership ( forests/Portals/142/docs/Reporting_REDD-Media_Pack.pdf)

The World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility helps countries prepare for REDD+, explores ways to provide payments and tests ways REDD+ can improve livelihoods and biodiversity conservation (http://www.

The REDD+ Partnership ( is a platform for countries to coordinate and scale-up their REDD+ activities. In time it will be replaced by or included in the official REDD+ mechanism that parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change are still to agree.

By visiting EJN's site, you agree to the use of cookies, which are designed to improve your experience and are used for the purpose of analytics and personalization. To find out more, read our Privacy Policy