Philippine environmental defenders in the crosshairs of red-taggers

LiCAS News
Capas, Tarlac, the Philippines

Philippine environmental defenders in the crosshairs of red-taggers

This is part 2 of a series on the threats facing the Indigenous Aeta tribe in the Philippines as they struggle to protect their land from environmental degradation. Read part 1.

At exactly 7p.m., a member of the Aeta tribe in the Philippines’ Central Luzon region, called everyone to prayer.

Families emerged from huts and gathered inside a chapel in the village of Sapang Kawayan, a remote tribal settlement in Capas, Tarlac province.

The faint noise from the construction site made its way into the chapel, reminding the people of the “monster” that is slowly encroaching into their land.

sports facilities inside new clark city
One of the sports facilities inside New Clark City / Credit: Bernice Beltran.

Petronilla Capiz-Munoz, known as “Apung Pet” to her tribe, said she sought help from the local government about the threat of the New Clark City project to her tribe.

But the government person who was tasked to help the community was tagged as a communist, like many other activists who voiced their concern about human rights.

Since 2016, Pia Montalban, a human rights officer in the local government of Tarlac, held dialogues in areas affected by the government’s “development project.”

She received and heard the complaints from the communities.

One day, some time in 2018, she was surprised to see the words "NPA supporter" below her name hand-painted on a piece of cloth in her office.

The “NPA,” or the New People's Army, is the armed wing of the underground Communist Party of the Philippines, which was declared a terrorist organization by Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte in 2017.

Montalban was afraid, but she continued to help Apung Pet and linked the woman to a lawyer.

Fighting for the environment kills

In 2018, the Philippine government released a list of 600 “terrorists,” many of whom are human rights activists and environment defenders.

Barracks inside the New Clark City complex in Capas, Tarlac / Credit: Bernice Beltran, taken in 2019

One of those in the list is Joan Carling, a UN “Champions of the Earth” awardee and a member of the board of the group Indigenous Peoples Rights International.

The Philippines’ Commission on Human Rights defines red-tagging as “an act of state actors, particularly law enforcement agencies, to publicly brand individuals, groups, or institutions as affiliated to communist or leftist terrorists.”

In December 2020, environment group Kalikasan People’s Network for the Environment raised the alarm over the “red-tagging” of some of its members.

Red-tagging of individuals and groups in the Philippines have led to illegal arrests, harassment, and extra-judicial killings in recent months.

Montalban, Carling, and the group Kalikasan PNE have one thing in common: they opposed projects and policies that “harm nature and the communities that rely on it.”

Carling noted that whenever tribal people oppose government projects, the prevailing narrative of indigenous peoples as “backward, illiterate, anti-development, or worse, criminals” would surface.

“It is easy for state forces to brand indigenous peoples as terrorists because they live in the forests and mountains where the communist rebels have also set camp,” said Carling.

“The narrative obscures the fact that the traditional governance of indigenous peoples and their sustainable lifestyle have helped conserve the rich biodiversity of the land,” she said.

Carling, who has been tagged as a terrorist for her advocacy for indigenous peoples’ rights, said she would not be surprised if her name reappears on another list with the passage of a new anti-terrorism law.

The Philippines’ new anti-terrorism law authorizes the warrantless arrest of groups or individuals involved in alleged “acts of terrorists.”

Although the new law exempts advocacies and humanitarian activities from the definition of “terrorism,” several human rights and environmental defenders have already been red-tagged.

And among those tagged are indigenous peoples and communities.

Taken in December 2019, this image shows a portion of a hill that has been shaved inside the New Clark City complex / Credit: Bernice Beltran

Development over people’s rights

The forest and the hills where the Aetas’ ancestors hunted, foraged, and farmed for centuries are now bare land dotted with mounds of sand, gravel, and dirt.

It is here where the 9,450-hectare “eco-friendly” metropolis called “New Clark City” will rise.

An Aeta man on a motorbike arrives at Sapang Kawayan village / Credit: Bernice Beltran.

The government’s Bases and Conversion Development Authority said the project will “ease” the poorly-planned and densely-populated Metro Manila and generate jobs in Central Luzon region.

The new city will use “green energy resources” to power its public utilities.

But Leon Dulce, national coordinator of Kalikasan PNE, said the project will never be “eco-friendly.”

“The [contractors] bulldozed forested areas … and the displacement of the indigenous communities will negatively affect the ecosystem,” he said.

Apung Pet said the developers seemed not to have realized that “nature is more powerful than us.”

“Nature does not care if you are rich or poor. If we destroy it, it will punish us. If we nurture it, it will provide us food and water generously,” said the tribal leader.

She recalled how her tribe takes care of the environment and how the environment also takes care of the people.

“When one of us would catch a wild boar, we would share it with the entire clan,” she said. “If we kill every animal we see, then we will have nothing left in the future.”

The Aetas practice crop rotation, that is planting different crops sequentially on the same plot of land to improve soil health, optimize nutrients in the soil, and combat pest and weed pressure.

“God made sure that we have what we need to survive. In return, we must cultivate it,” she said. “That’s why you can’t separate us from this land.”

She said the reason why indigenous people seldom go to the hospital is because they have leaves, roots, and stems of plants to treat whatever ailments they have.

“This is the only land we have and we cannot afford to lose it,” said Apung Pet.

Petronilla Capiz-Muñoz (Apung Pet) poses for a portrait before she heads to the fields to work / Credit: Bernice Beltran.

Threatening the tribe

The Aetas have also been red-tagged.

Montalban, who continues to help the community even after leaving government service, said the red-tagging undermines efforts in asserting the indigenous people’s rights.

“We need to counter the government’s narrative,” said Carling. “We need to show evidence that the [anti-terrorism law] hinders our efforts to protect biodiversity.”

Several human rights activists and groups have filed petitions against the new law.

The Commission on Human Rights assured that it will ensure that the rights of individuals and groups who are tagged as terrorists will be protected.

Meanwhile, several of those tagged have already been killed.

In December, nine tribal people from the Tumandok tribe in the province of Panay in the central Philippines were killed by policemen and soldiers in separate raids.

They were tagged as “supporters” of communist rebels for protesting against a local dam project.

This story was produced with the support of Internews' Earth Journalism Network and was originally published on 24 March 2021 in Licas News. 

Banner image: An Aeta woman shows one of the construction sites near her hut in Sitio Alli, in Capas town, Tarlac. She and her husband lost about four hectares of farm to the development project / Credit: Bernice Beltran.

By visiting EJN's site, you agree to the use of cookies, which are designed to improve your experience and are used for the purpose of analytics and personalization. To find out more, read our Privacy Policy

Related Stories